Campaigns
Library
For Media
Logo
Skip to main content
Register
|
Login
Home
Who We Are
How You Can Help
Learn About Human Rights
News
Stay Informed
›
Recent publications
›
Highlighted research
›
Home
›
Library
›
Document - Turkey: Unfair trials -- failed justice under new courts
Document - Turkey: Unfair trials -- failed justice under new courts
TURKEY Turkey: Unfair trials -- failed justice under new courts
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL
PRESS RELEASE
AI Index:
EUR 44/014/2006
(
Public
)
News Service No:
222
6 September 2006
Embargo Date:
6 September 2006
00:01
GMT
Turkey: Unfair trials -- failed justice under new courts
Amnesty International has revealed today that people charged under anti-terrorism legislation in Turkey continue to face unending trials with some people still detained after more than a decade.
In its report,
Turkey: Justice delayed and denied,
the organization points out that such trials often rely on past evidence obtained through torture.
"Unfair trials continue to blight Turkey's human rights record. A look at the prolonged and flawed trials of those charged under anti-terrorism legislation provides a striking indication of the extent of the failure of justice in Turkey today," said Nicola Duckworth, Director of the Europe and Central Asia Programme at Amnesty International.
"The Turkish government professes its commitment to eradicating torture, yet it is shocking to discover that evidence extracted through such methods continues to be admitted in the special Heavy Penal Courts and judges are still refusing to throw it out."
Those charged under anti-terrorism legislation are brought to trial before special Heavy Penal Courts, which replaced the State Security Courts in June 2004. However, the same pattern of unfair trial procedures continues:
People charged as far back as 1993 are still behind bars having been denied an effective defence or genuine retrial, even where the European Court of Human Rights has ruled on their case and found Turkey in violation of its fair trial obligations;
Judges and prosecutors are often the same people who presided over the same cases in the days of the State Security Courts, thus recreating the old pattern of failed justice under the new system;
The right to effective defence is violated by judges who routinely and arbitrarily fail to call witnesses to be brought to testify and be cross-examined by defence lawyers.
Even after the Turkish authorities have provided the possibility for people to be retried following European Court judgments finding Turkey in violation of fair trial principles, to date such retrials have not been a fresh, thorough and impartial re-examination of the evidence.
"By law, some people in whose favour the European Court of Human Rights has ruled, have the right to retrial. However to date, if such a retrial is opened, it is conducted in a way worthy of Kafka's attention - the same judges and prosecutors wipe off the dust on the same files and predictably reach the same decision that was already criticized by the Court in the first place. Old and compromised evidence, most often obtained through torture, is not overturned," Nicola Duckworth said.
Moreover, in providing the right to retrial following European Court rulings finding Turkey in violation of fair trial rights, the government has introduced a get-out clause which blocks the possible retrial of anyone with cases pending at the Court on 4 February 2003. The motivation for this was to find a way to avoid the retrial of Abdullah Öcalan, leader of the Kurdistan Workers' Party. The measure thus also has a discriminatory effect on all the other cases in the European Court which, along with Abdullah Öcalan's, were pending on the same date.
"The Turkish authorities must undertake as an urgent priority a systematic review of all pending criminal proceedings to determine all those cases where there are allegations that during interrogation statements by suspects/defendants or witnesses were illegally extracted through torture or other ill-treatment. They must take steps to drop all cases where there is well-founded suspicion that the main evidence against the defendant is based on 'confessions' allegedly extracted by force," Nicola Duckworth said.
Amnesty International calls on the Turkish authorities to comply with international standards for fair trials and undertake a full investigation of all torture allegations; end all use of torture evidence in court; ensure the right to an effective defence; end prolonged pre-trial detention and protracted criminal proceedings.
For more information see:
Turkey: Justice delayed and denied: The persistence of protracted and unfair trials for those charged under anti-terrorism legislation,
AI Index: EUR 44/013/2006,
http://web.amnesty.org/library/index/engeur440132006
.
Public Document
****************************************
For more information please call Amnesty International's press office in London, UK, on +44 20 7413 5566
Amnesty International, 1 Easton St., London WC1X 0DW. web:
http://www.amnesty.org
For latest human rights news view
http://news.amnesty.org
Amnesty International, International Secretariat, 1 Easton Street, WC1X 0DW, London, United Kingdom
View the overview page for this document
Print
Amnesty International Report 2008
The state of the world's human rights
Read the full report online
In your country:
Select country
Afghanistan
Albania
Algeria
American Samoa
Andorra
Angola
Anguilla
Antigua & Barbuda
Antilles
Argentina
Armenia
Australia
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belgium
Belize
Benin
Bermuda
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bosnia-Herzegovina
Botswana
Brazil
Brunei Darussalam
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Canada
Cape Verde
Cayman Islands
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
Colombia
Comoros
Congo
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Côte d'Ivoire
Croatia
Cuba
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Democratic Republic Of Congo
Denmark
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Ethiopia
Falkland Islands
Faroe Islands
Fiji
Finland
France
French Guiana
French Polynesia
Gabon
Gambia
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Greenland
Grenada
Guadeloupe
Guam
Guatemala
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Honduras
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
India
Indonesia
Iran
Iraq
Ireland
Israel ~ Occupied Territories
Italy
Jamaica
Japan
Jordan
Kazakstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Laos
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Libya
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macao
Macedonia
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Martinique
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mexico
Micronesia
Moldova
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Montserrat
Morocco/Western Sahara
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands
New Caledonia
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Niue
North Korea
Norway
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestinian Authority
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Pitcairn Islands
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Reunion
Romania
Russia
Rwanda
San Marino
São Tomé and Príncipe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Singapore
Slovak Republic
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
Somalia
South Africa
South Korea
Spain
Sri Lanka
St Kitts and Nevis
St Lucia
St Vincent
Sudan
Suriname
Swaziland
Sweden
Switzerland
Syria
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania
Thailand
Timor-Leste
Togo
Tonga
Trinidad & Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Turks & Caicos Islands
Tuvalu
UAE
Uganda
UK
Ukraine
Uruguay
USA
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Vatican
Venezuela
Viet Nam
Virgin Islands (UK)
Virgin Islands (US)
Western Samoa
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe